Misinformation Alerts
Knowing what misinformation is being shared can help you generate effective messaging.
These insights are based on a combination of automated media monitoring and manual review by public health data analysts. Media data are publicly available data from many sources, such as social media, broadcast television, newspapers and magazines, news websites, online video, blogs, and more. Analysts from the Public Good Projects triangulate this data along with other data from fact checking organizations and investigative sources to provide an accurate, but not exhaustive, list of currently circulating misinformation.Misinformation Alerts
Knowing what misinformation is being shared can help you generate effective messaging.
These insights are based on a combination of automated media monitoring and manual review by public health data analysts. Media data are publicly available data from many sources, such as social media, broadcast television, newspapers and magazines, news websites, online video, blogs, and more. Analysts from the Public Good Projects triangulate this data along with other data from fact checking organizations and investigative sources to provide an accurate, but not exhaustive, list of currently circulating misinformation.Alerts are categorized as high, medium, and low risk.
- High risk alerts: Narratives with widespread circulation across communities, high engagement, exponential velocity, and a high potential to impact health decisions. Are often more memorable than accurate information.
- Medium risk alerts: Narratives that are circulating in priority populations and pose some threat to health. Potential for further spread due to the tactics used or because of predicted velocity. Often highlights the questions and concerns of people.
- Low risk alerts: Narratives that are limited in reach, don’t impact your community, or lack the qualities necessary for future spread. May indicate information gaps, confusion, or concerns.
In a social media post with tens of thousands of engagements, a user claims that her husband developed myocarditis and a chronic, fatal heart condition after receiving the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. The account has frequently promoted misinformation about vaccine safety and, in the last year, has claimed that vaccines caused severe injuries to herself, her aunt, and even her dog.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
Serious side effects from COVID-19 vaccines are exceedingly rare, and it’s up to health and legal authorities to determine whether adverse events are related to vaccination. Emphasizing that anti-vaccine accounts often use unverified stories about vaccine injuries to promote misinformation and discourage vaccination is recommended. Messaging may also explain that a common tactic of vaccine opponents is circulating unsubstantiated stories about injuries and deaths that they claim are related to vaccination. Fact Checking Source(s):
A physician-researcher who gained prominence for promoting COVID-19 conspiracy theories recently claimed that the flu vaccine is “built on a lie.” In a video clip, he falsely claims that the purpose of the vaccine is not to protect against the flu but to indoctrinate people into taking a vaccine every year.
Recommendation:
High Risk Read More +
Messaging may explain that decades of research show that the flu shot protects against infection and reduces the risk of serious illness and complications from the flu. Annual flu vaccination is encouraged because the flu can be quite severe and even deadly, especially in those who are very young, very old, pregnant, or have preexisting health conditions. Fact-Checking Source(s):
An anti-mandate account posted an image to social media mocking a person receiving a vaccination while wearing a mask for being injected with “unknown substances” while being “afraid to breathe air.”
Recommendation:
Low Risk Read More +
The post misrepresents some basic facts, including that masks do not prevent breathing and that there are no unknown substances in COVID-19 vaccines. Consider countering these misconceptions by emphasizing the transparency of vaccine ingredients. Messaging may also explain that the ingredient lists for the authorized COVID-19 vaccines have been available for nearly two years and that nearly two-thirds of the world’s population is fully vaccinated. Fact-checking sources:
An image that is circulating on multiple social media platforms insinuates that COVID-19 vaccines are causing a global cancer epidemic. The image shows a fact-checking article from last year that debunked the claim that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer next to a news headline about a study that found an increase in cancer worldwide in people under the age of 50. By placing the two headlines together, the post urges readers to assume causation.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
Emphasizing that there is no link between COVID-19 vaccines and cancer is recommended. In addition, the data on the cancer epidemic predates the pandemic by nearly a decade. The study reviewed cancer data that was published between the 1990s and the early 2010s and found that cancer rates in younger adults have been trending upward for decades. Reiterating that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and that severe side effects are extremely rare is recommended. Fact Checking Source(s):
A conspiracy news site published an article falsely claiming that one in 500 children under age 5 who received the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine were hospitalized from vaccine side effects. The basis for the claim is a study in which 10 young children out of 7,800 who received the Pfizer were hospitalized.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
Emphasizing that the article used data from the study out of context and misrepresents researchers' findings is recommended. All 10 children who were hospitalized received a vaccine dose higher than the 3 micrograms that is authorized by the FDA for children ages 6 months to 4 years. Pfizer has also stated clearly that 3 micrograms is the safest dosage for children in that age group. Messaging may emphasize, as the referenced study did, that the COVID-19 vaccine has a similar safety profile as other routine childhood vaccines. Fact Checking Source(s):
A video clip and social media post from a popular right-wing political commentator launched a firestorm of misinformation about the CDC updating its childhood immunization schedule to include COVID-19 vaccination. The commentator misrepresented the CDC’s recommendations by claiming that the agency is requiring all school-aged children to receive COVID-19 vaccines to attend school. This false claim has been repeated by several high-profile figures and news sites.
Recommendation:
High Risk Read More +
Messaging may explain that the CDC does not have the authority to set any vaccination requirements, only to make recommendations. Emphasizing that the agency has maintained recommended routine immunization for infants, children, and adults for decades is recommended, as is explaining that each state sets its own vaccine requirements and schedules, which is why the vaccinations required to enroll in public schools vary from state to state. For example, the CDC recommends that all children receive two doses of the hepatitis B vaccine by the age of 2, but only 17 states require students to receive the vaccine to enroll in school. Fact-Checking Source(s):
Several large social media accounts circulated a video clip of President Biden at a FEMA meeting last year encouraging people who live in areas that are prone to hurricanes to get vaccinated before hurricane season. The video was shared last week with the false claim that the president claimed that COVID-19 vaccines would protect people against Hurricane Ian.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
Emphasizing that the clip is being used out of context and that many responses to the clip misunderstand why vaccination is a standard part of disaster preparation is recommended. Messaging may emphasize that infectious disease outbreaks following natural disasters are common and well documented, usually resulting from population displacement, disruptions to health care, and damage to infrastructure. Being up to date on vaccines decreases the risk of contracting a vaccine-preventable illness during or immediately after a disaster. Fact Checking Source(s):
A small study of 11 people has gone viral after finding that breast milk may contain trace amounts of mRNA from COVID-19 vaccines up to 48 hours after vaccination. The study has been circulated worldwide by several high-profile social media accounts and right-wing news sites, with some claiming that getting vaccinated while breastfeeding is dangerous for babies. The study did not find that breastfeeding after COVID-19 vaccination was unsafe and only recommended avoiding breastfeeding in the first two days after vaccination out of an abundance of caution.
Recommendation:
High Risk Read More +
The widespread nature of this misinformation increases its risk. Emphasizing that the amount of mRNA found in breast milk is negligible and there is no indication that it is harmful is recommended. Consider countering this information by explaining that this study and many others have concluded that it is perfectly safe to breastfeed after COVID-19 vaccination. Fact-Checking Source(s):
An article from a conspiracy site falsely claims that the Canadian government ended its COVID-19 vaccine mandate because vaccinated people make up nine out of 10 COVID-19 deaths.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
Consider countering this misinformation by emphasizing that the claim misrepresents the Canadian government's reasons for changing its vaccination requirements and misinterprets data about death by COVID-19 vaccination status. Canada will no longer require travelers entering the country to provide proof of COVID-19 vaccination because the country has a high vaccination rate as well as low rates of hospitalizations and deaths. Emphasizing that Canada’s high vaccination rate makes it easy to mistakenly believe that vaccinated people are more likely than unvaccinated people to die from COVID-19 is recommended. Vaccinated people make up a much larger portion of the population so they make up a larger number of deaths, even though they are at far lower risk of dying or being hospitalized from COVID-19 than unvaccinated people. Fact Checking Source(s):
A recent study examines a potential link between the aluminum in some vaccines and childhood asthma. The study found a slight increase in asthma that corresponded to children’s exposure to aluminum, which was estimated using vaccination records.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
Emphasizing that the study does not show that aluminum in vaccines causes autism is recommended as is explaining that further research is needed to determine if there is a link between aluminum exposure and asthma. The study’s researchers acknowledge that because the study was observational, it cannot determine if the aluminum in vaccines causes asthma. Additionally, the analysis did not include information that may have influenced the findings, including family history of asthma or exposure to secondhand smoke, which can trigger asthma. Fact Checking Source(s):
Alerts are categorized as high, medium, and low risk.
- High risk alerts: Narratives with widespread circulation across communities, high engagement, exponential velocity, and a high potential to impact health decisions. Are often more memorable than accurate information.
- Medium risk alerts: Narratives that are circulating in priority populations and pose some threat to health. Potential for further spread due to the tactics used or because of predicted velocity. Often highlights the questions and concerns of people.
- Low risk alerts: Narratives that are limited in reach, don’t impact your community, or lack the qualities necessary for future spread. May indicate information gaps, confusion, or concerns.
Vaccine Misinformation Guide
Get practical tips for addressing misinformation in this new guide. Click image to download, or see highlights.