Misinformation Alerts
Knowing what misinformation is being shared can help you generate effective messaging.
These insights are based on a combination of automated media monitoring and manual review by public health data analysts. Media data are publicly available data from many sources, such as social media, broadcast television, newspapers and magazines, news websites, online video, blogs, and more. Analysts from the Public Good Projects triangulate this data along with other data from fact checking organizations and investigative sources to provide an accurate, but not exhaustive, list of currently circulating misinformation.Misinformation Alerts
Knowing what misinformation is being shared can help you generate effective messaging.
These insights are based on a combination of automated media monitoring and manual review by public health data analysts. Media data are publicly available data from many sources, such as social media, broadcast television, newspapers and magazines, news websites, online video, blogs, and more. Analysts from the Public Good Projects triangulate this data along with other data from fact checking organizations and investigative sources to provide an accurate, but not exhaustive, list of currently circulating misinformation.Alerts are categorized as high, medium, and low risk.
- High risk alerts: Narratives with widespread circulation across communities, high engagement, exponential velocity, and a high potential to impact health decisions. Are often more memorable than accurate information.
- Medium risk alerts: Narratives that are circulating in priority populations and pose some threat to health. Potential for further spread due to the tactics used or because of predicted velocity. Often highlights the questions and concerns of people.
- Low risk alerts: Narratives that are limited in reach, don’t impact your community, or lack the qualities necessary for future spread. May indicate information gaps, confusion, or concerns.
As of last week, Twitter has stopped enforcing its COVID-19 misinformation policy, which allowed users to flag content promoting false or misleading information about COVID-19 for review and potential removal from the platform.
Twitter’s COVID-19 guidelines were launched in January 2020 to combat misinformation in real time and make it easier for users to find accurate information about COVID-19 on the platform. The rules, while imperfect, have led to the suspension of over 11,000 accounts circulating COVID-19 misinformation. With the end of the policy, some large accounts that fueled early waves of COVID-19 misinformation and contributed to enduring vaccine hesitancy have returned to the site. Other prominent anti-vaccine accounts that have been flagged by public health and fact-checking organizations are expected to return soon.
Recommendation:
High Risk Read More +
The loss of Twitter’s COVID-19 policy coupled with the proposed return of the blue check subscription that enables any individual to purchase account verification without vetting means that anti-vaccine conspiracists will now have increased reach on the platform. The impact is unlikely to be limited to COVID-19, as many accounts that promote misleading COVID-19 content also circulate misinformation and conspiracy theories about vaccines, polio, and other health issues. Continuing to report misinformation on other platforms is recommended, as is exercising caution when consuming and sharing health information on Twitter. Following trusted accounts and double-checking that verified accounts are real and reputable sources of information are also recommended. Consider countering misinformation on the safety and efficacy of vaccines by emphasizing the amount of time and research that goes into the development process and the billions of people worldwide who have safely received vaccines. Fact-Checking Source(s):
Shortly after a country singer passed away in his sleep, vaccine conspiracists began baselessly claiming that COVID-19 vaccines caused his death. The bogus evidence for the claim is that the singer was vaccinated in April 2021.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
Emphasizing how anti-vaccine advocates exploit the deaths of celebrities and other public figures to circulate vaccine misinformation is recommended. These groups have blamed COVID-19 vaccines for deaths that were later determined to be from old age, cancer, drug overdose, and chronic illnesses. As with previous instances, there is no evidence linking the death to COVID-19 vaccines. Both the singer’s family and publicist have dismissed the claim that the vaccine caused his death, requesting they be allowed to grieve while waiting for a full autopsy report. Fact Checking Source(s):
A news report stating that vaccinated people make up the majority of COVID-19 deaths is being used by vaccine opponents to try to discredit COVID-19 vaccines. One post calls COVID-19 vaccines “experimental toxins” being pushed by the government.
The posts are sharing the headline rather than the article itself. The article explains that vaccinated people are at lower risk of severe illness and death from COVID-19. Vaccinated people make up a much larger proportion of the population and are more likely to be over the age of 65, which is the greatest risk factor for COVID-19 death.
Recommendation:
High Risk Read More +
Messaging may emphasize that the article clearly explains that vaccinated people are at lower risk of severe illness and death from COVID-19. The numbers are misleading because 70 percent of the population and over 93 percent of people over the age of 65—who are at greatest risk of COVID-19 death—are fully vaccinated. It’s not surprising that when an overwhelming majority of a population belongs to a group, then that group will make up a large proportion of any effect. For example, people wearing seatbelts make up the majority of car accident deaths. That doesn’t mean that seatbelts cause these deaths or that not wearing a seatbelt is safer. It just means that because most people wear seatbelts, most car accidents, fatal or otherwise, involve people wearing seatbelts. Fact-Checking Source(s):
A video posted on social media features an internal medicine doctor falsely claiming that physicians are not taught about vaccines in medical school. The post received hundreds of engagements before it was flagged as misinformation.
Recommendation:
Low Risk Read More +
Responding to each piece of misinformation may detract from priority talking points. Messaging may explain that vaccines and their function, effectiveness, production, and risks are a standard part of every physician’s medical education and that medical doctors are generally far more knowledgeable about vaccines than the general public. Fact-checking sources:
A documentary that has been viewed over 10 million times since it was released last week claims to document instances of people dying suddenly after COVID-19 vaccination. The film was produced by a radio host known for promoting conspiracy theories and anti-vaccine myths and shows videos of people collapsing from supposed vaccine side effects. It also shows large blood clots that are purportedly from the bodies of vaccinated people.
Recommendation:
High Risk Read More +
Emphasizing the documentary’s misrepresentations and blatant lies is recommended, as is explaining that the film blames any sudden or unexplained death on COVID-19 vaccines, without any evidence, knowledge of other health conditions, or even confirmation of vaccination status. Consider combating misinformation by explaining that baselessly claiming that deaths are related to vaccines, even when there is evidence to the contrary, is a common tactic of vaccine opponents. Many of the people featured in the film didn’t die at all; they fainted, collapsed from exhaustion, or experienced seizures. Among those featured in the film are people who fainted due to low blood pressure and an athlete who collapsed before any COVID-19 vaccines were available. One teen died from heart complications before vaccines were authorized for his age group and another died the day before she was scheduled to get vaccinated. Several autopsy experts have pointed out that the blood clots featured in the film are consistent with normal blood clotting that occurs after death. Messaging may emphasize that there is no evidence that COVID-19 vaccines increase the risk of sudden death and that the vaccines have been safely administered to 70 percent of the world’s population. Fact-Checking Source(s):
Several trending social posts have attempted to link COVID-19 vaccines to the rise in respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) cases in children over the last few months. One post claims that “experimental” COVID-19 vaccines drove RSV to record high levels so pharmaceutical companies could profit off an RSV vaccine.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
Emphasizing that there is no evidence of any kind that COVID-19 vaccines are linked to RSV infections is recommended. In clinical trials, there was no difference in RSV rates between children who received vaccines and children who received a placebo. Many of the current RSV cases are infants who are too young to be vaccinated for COVID-19. Fact Checking Source(s):
An anti-mandate social media account posted the image of a billboard that is reportedly outside the CDC’s Atlanta headquarters. The billboard claims that COVID-19 vaccines are killing children and asks when the CDC will “stop the COVID shot?"
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
The location of the billboard has not been verified. Sticking to key talking points is recommended. Responding with empathy and acknowledging the concerns of parents is recommended, as is explaining how vaccination will help protect both children and their families. Informational materials may also emphasize that vaccines have been rigorously tested to make sure that they are safe for all vaccinated individuals, including children, and that adverse side effects are extremely rare. Reminding people that there is no evidence COVID-19 vaccines are harmful to children and there is considerable evidence that vaccines protect against serious illness and death from COVID-19 in children is also recommended. Fact Checking Source(s):
Several social media users are questioning what happened to monkeypox following the global outbreak earlier this year, with one viral post suggesting that the disease’s “marketing team” quit. The post suggests that monkeypox is not deadly and was never a real threat.
Recommendation:
Low Risk Read More +
Emphasizing that monkeypox cases decreased globally because of the targeted awareness and vaccination campaigns spearheaded by public health and LGBTQIA+ organizations, the availability of vaccines in upper-middle- and high-income nations, and behavioral changes is recommended. Although cases have declined in many countries, monkeypox is still a threat in low-income nations like the Democratic Republic of the Congo, which was hardest hit by the disease and still lacks access to vaccines. Messaging may explain that the viral strain causing the global outbreaks is a mutation of a less deadly and more transmissible monkeypox strain that caused an outbreak in Nigeria five years ago. While it is true that the recent outbreaks were less deadly than past outbreaks, a total of 50 people have died. Fact-checking sources:
A widely shared video features an OBGYN claiming that many newborns of mothers vaccinated for COVID-19 have vaccine-induced AIDS (VAIDS). One post sharing the video claims that the vaccines have been a “disaster.”
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
Messaging may emphasize that VAIDS does not exist. Explaining that it’s a made-up term coined by vaccine opponents to dissuade people from getting vaccinated is recommended. Several large studies have found that getting vaccinated while pregnant has no negative effects on pregnancy outcomes or neonatal health. COVID-19 infection increases the risk of pregnancy complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes, making it especially important for pregnant people to get vaccinated. Fact Checking Source(s):
In a video clip, a physician whose license was suspended for promoting COVID-19 misinformation claims flu vaccines are being used to experiment on people and that the government has been lying about the flu shot’s effectiveness for decades.
Recommendation:
High Risk Read More +
Emphasizing that the flu vaccines are not experimental but are the result of decades of research showing that they protect against flu infection, severe illness, and complications is recommended. Messaging may explain that annual flu vaccination is encouraged because the flu can be deadly, especially for those who are at high risk, including infants and young children, older adults, and people with preexisting health conditions. Fact-Checking Source(s):
Alerts are categorized as high, medium, and low risk.
- High risk alerts: Narratives with widespread circulation across communities, high engagement, exponential velocity, and a high potential to impact health decisions. Are often more memorable than accurate information.
- Medium risk alerts: Narratives that are circulating in priority populations and pose some threat to health. Potential for further spread due to the tactics used or because of predicted velocity. Often highlights the questions and concerns of people.
- Low risk alerts: Narratives that are limited in reach, don’t impact your community, or lack the qualities necessary for future spread. May indicate information gaps, confusion, or concerns.
Vaccine Misinformation Guide
Get practical tips for addressing misinformation in this new guide. Click image to download, or see highlights.