On December 13, the New York Times reported that in 2022, a lawyer assisting presumptive HHS secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in screening federal health officials petitioned the FDA to revoke its approval of the inactivated polio vaccine. Since Friday, the story has been trending nationally and globally, with many criticizing the attempt to discredit an established and trusted vaccine. In response, several politicians have attempted to distance themselves from criticism of the polio vaccine. However, other social media posts claimed that the modern polio vaccine was not properly tested and was not as safe as the vaccine developed by Jonas Salk in the early 1950s. Some also repeated the myth that routine vaccines have not been subjected to randomized controlled trials. Some posts displayed broad anti-vaccine beliefs, insisting that children receive too many vaccines and that vaccines cause more harm than good.
Recommendation:
High Impact Read More +
False and misleading narratives about routine vaccine safety can drive hesitancy, especially when coming from high-ranking officials. Debunking messaging may emphasize that the inactivated polio vaccine is one of the safest vaccines available, with no serious adverse reactions associated with it. Talking points may explain that the polio vaccine has been closely monitored for decades. Safety data from millions of vaccine doses reveal few adverse events and no safety concerns. Messaging may also highlight that the polio vaccine used in the U.S. is the modern version of Salk’s polio vaccine. Fact-Checking Source(s): AAP, CHOP Messaging:
About Us
Sign Up for Public Health Alerts
About Us
Learn More