A recent New York Times article shares the stories of people who believe they have COVID-19 vaccine-related injuries and the challenges these individuals face. The article also discusses VAERS, research on COVID-19 vaccine safety, and the role the anti-vaccine movement plays in hurting the credibility of vaccine injury reports. In response, vaccine opponents and conspiracists accused the newspaper of “backtracking” about vaccine safety and baselessly claimed that vaccine injuries are underestimated. A popular news anchor revealed his own suspected vaccine injuries, setting off a wave of condemnation of the journalist who “pushed” COVID-19 vaccines and the legacy media that allegedly “concealed” vaccine injuries.
Recommendation:
High Risk Read More +
While the Times article gives a voice to people who feel their injuries are being ignored, it also adds fuel to the fire of vaccine opponents who are using it to drastically overstate vaccine risks. Prebunking messaging may emphasize that no medical intervention has zero risks, and vaccines are no exception. The fact that an extremely small portion of vaccine recipients may have experienced serious adverse reactions does not mean that the vaccines as a whole are unsafe. Messaging may also explain that with over 270 million Americans—and 5.5 billion people worldwide—having received vaccines, even a risk that affects a fraction of a percent of recipients will affect thousands of people. However, the benefits of vaccines still outweigh the risk as COVID-19 vaccines have saved millions of lives around the world. Fact-Checking Source(s): Vaxopedia, FactCheck.org
About Us
Sign Up for Public Health Alerts
About Us
Learn More