Misinformation Alerts
Knowing what misinformation is being shared can help you generate effective messaging.
These insights are based on a combination of automated media monitoring and manual review by public health data analysts. Media data are publicly available data from many sources, such as social media, broadcast television, newspapers and magazines, news websites, online video, blogs, and more. Analysts from the Public Good Projects triangulate this data along with other data from fact checking organizations and investigative sources to provide an accurate, but not exhaustive, list of currently circulating misinformation.Misinformation Alerts
Knowing what misinformation is being shared can help you generate effective messaging.
These insights are based on a combination of automated media monitoring and manual review by public health data analysts. Media data are publicly available data from many sources, such as social media, broadcast television, newspapers and magazines, news websites, online video, blogs, and more. Analysts from the Public Good Projects triangulate this data along with other data from fact checking organizations and investigative sources to provide an accurate, but not exhaustive, list of currently circulating misinformation.Alerts are categorized as high, medium, and low risk.
- High risk alerts: Narratives with widespread circulation across communities, high engagement, exponential velocity, and a high potential to impact health decisions. Are often more memorable than accurate information.
- Medium risk alerts: Narratives that are circulating in priority populations and pose some threat to health. Potential for further spread due to the tactics used or because of predicted velocity. Often highlights the questions and concerns of people.
- Low risk alerts: Narratives that are limited in reach, don’t impact your community, or lack the qualities necessary for future spread. May indicate information gaps, confusion, or concerns.
A trending video clip features a comedian repeating the debunked myth that Bill Gates admitted that vaccines are a part of his plan to depopulate the planet. The claim misrepresents Gates’s comments about the climate crisis, in which he stated that global access to “new vaccines, health care, and reproductive health services” would lead to slower population growth. This is supported by decades of research showing that birth rates decrease as living conditions improve.
Recommendation:
Low Risk Read More +
Variations of this myth have circulated among conspiracists for years, and responding to every false claim may detract from priority talking points. Continuing to emphasize the necessity of vaccines to protect against deadly and debilitating diseases is recommended. Fact-checking sources: Reuters, Poynter
A clip has resurfaced of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. claiming that COVID-19 vaccines cause heart attacks in vaccinated people at five times the rate of unvaccinated people. The clip originally circulated in January.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
The persistence of this false claim increases its risk. Debunking messaging may emphasize that COVID-19 vaccination is not associated with an increased heart attack risk—COVID-19 infection is. In fact, in people with previous COVID-19 infections, COVID-19 vaccination may decrease the risk of heart attack, stroke, and other cardiovascular issues. Severe adverse reactions following COVID-19 vaccines are extremely rare. Fact Checking Source(s): Science Feedback, AP
A far-right conspiracy article circulating on social media misleadingly claims that 1 in 3 COVID-19 vaccine recipients experience “neurological side effects.” Several popular anti-vaccine accounts shared the article.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
The potential for this misleading claim to cause vaccine hesitancy increases its risk. Debunking messaging may explain that the overwhelming majority of the “neurological side effects” reported in the study were mild headaches and drowsiness, and none were severe, lasting, or required hospitalization. Messaging may also note that the study compared side effects across different vaccine types, not between vaccine recipients and unvaccinated controls. Continuing to emphasize that over two-thirds of the world’s population has safely received COVID-19 vaccines with no evidence of widespread health issues is recommended. Fact Checking Source(s): Health Feedback
Several widely circulated posts claim that the spike protein mRNA in COVID-19 vaccines and the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) that transport the RNA to the cells are harmful. One post claims that the mRNA in the vaccine “hijacks” cells, causing them to produce “poison” spike protein indefinitely.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
The persistence of misleading and false claims about mRNA vaccine safety increases the risk. Emphasizing that ingredients in COVID-19 vaccines are nontoxic is recommended. COVID-19 vaccines use LNPs to deliver intact mRNA to the cells and then instruct the cells to produce a spike protein, which is not harmful to humans. Fact Checking Source(s): Reuters, Health Feedback
Trending social media posts are promoting misleading and inaccurate claims about flu vaccines. Well-known vaccine opponents claimed flu vaccines “do not work at all” and shared a video asserting the “flu shot is no longer really necessary.” Some posts claim vaccines contain toxic ingredients, while others promote supplements and vitamin regimens as flu vaccine alternatives.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
Rhetoric that downplays the potential seriousness of the flu or the effectiveness of flu vaccines may negatively impact flu vaccine uptake, increasing its risk. Prebunking messaging may emphasize that the flu shot provides the best protection against the flu by reducing the risk of infection, severe illness, and complications. Messaging may also caution against supplements and other unproven methods to protect against the flu. Fact Checking Source(s): Mayo Clinic, Reuters, NIH
Shortly after news broke that an actor and star of a popular sitcom died in an apparent drowning accident, vaccine conspiracists began speculating that his death was linked to COVID-19 vaccines. Vaccine opponents circulated a 2021 social media post of the actor encouraging others to get vaccinated as alleged “proof” for the cause of death.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
Debunking messaging may explain that there is no evidence that COVID-19 vaccines had anything to do with the actor’s death. Baselessly blaming vaccines for high-profile deaths and illnesses regardless of the circumstances or evidence to the contrary is a now-familiar anti-vaccine tactic. Nearly 80 percent of adults in the U.S. completed their primary COVID-19 vaccine series safely and with evidence that no widespread health concerns resulted. Fact Checking Source(s): USA Today, Poynter
A recipe for a homemade herbal remedy called the “flu bomb” has gone viral on multiple social media platforms. The so-called “magical elixir” is purported to fight respiratory illnesses, including colds, COVID-19, flu, pneumonia, bronchitis, and sinus congestion.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
Although the recipe contains no harmful ingredients, its popularity and promotion as an alternative to vaccination increases its risk. Debunking messaging may emphasize that while the drink may help soothe symptoms, there is no evidence supporting claims that the remedy prevents or reduces the severity of respiratory infections like COVID-19 or the flu. Fact Checking Source(s): Logically Facts
A video is circulating of the son of the first World Economic Forum (WEF) chair, claiming that he and his mother are dying from injuries caused by “poison” COVID-19 vaccines. In the video, he calls for the arrests of Bill Gates, WHO and Pfizer leadership, and current WEF chair Klaus Schwab.
Recommendation:
Low Risk Read More +
Although the video has been widely circulated in anti-vaccine circles, responding to conspiracy theories may detract from priority talking points. Continuing to emphasize that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and adverse reactions extremely rare is recommended. Fact-checking sources: Mayo Clinic
An FDA preprint study monitoring the safety of pediatric COVID-19 vaccines flagged seizures and convulsions as a potential safety signal in children ages 2 to 5. The analysis explains that the new safety signal should be interpreted cautiously due to the study’s limitations, a warning ignored by social media users sharing the study without context. Vaccine opponents, including a popular anti-vaccine organization, are circulating the preliminary safety signal as though it is an established vaccine risk.
Recommendation:
High Risk Read More +
Misleading claims about the study are widespread and can potentially promote hesitancy, increasing their risk. Concerns about safety and side effects are among the main reasons parents are hesitant about or oppose COVID-19 vaccines for their children. Any potential safety concern, even an unconfirmed one, may worsen this hesitancy. Debunking messaging may reiterate the study’s conclusion that the new safety signal “should be interpreted with caution and further investigated” and emphasize that additional preliminary analysis indicates that the results may have been a research artifact (an artificial finding or observation resulting from the study’s design) rather than a real safety signal. Messaging may also explain the importance of investigating all potential safety signals and reiterate that this is an example of our vaccine safety monitoring systems working to detect extremely rare potential risks. Fact-Checking Source(s): CDC
A tech entrepreneur that has previously promoted false claims about COVID-19 vaccines is now claiming that COVID-19 vaccine recipients can sue vaccine manufacturers for damages because of “DNA contamination” that is considered “adulteration.” Although some vaccine conspiracists have shared baseless claims, others have criticized it as dishonest and a “counterproductive fantasy.”
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
The persistence and widespread nature of the claim increases its risk. Messaging may emphasize that there is no evidence that any COVID-19 vaccine contains significant quantities of DNA contamination or has the ability to alter DNA. Fact Checking Source(s): Health Feedback, AFP
Alerts are categorized as high, medium, and low risk.
- High risk alerts: Narratives with widespread circulation across communities, high engagement, exponential velocity, and a high potential to impact health decisions. Are often more memorable than accurate information.
- Medium risk alerts: Narratives that are circulating in priority populations and pose some threat to health. Potential for further spread due to the tactics used or because of predicted velocity. Often highlights the questions and concerns of people.
- Low risk alerts: Narratives that are limited in reach, don’t impact your community, or lack the qualities necessary for future spread. May indicate information gaps, confusion, or concerns.
Vaccine Misinformation Guide
Get practical tips for addressing misinformation in this new guide. Click image to download, or see highlights.