Misinformation Alerts
Knowing what misinformation is being shared can help you generate effective messaging.
These insights are based on a combination of automated media monitoring and manual review by public health data analysts. Media data are publicly available data from many sources, such as social media, broadcast television, newspapers and magazines, news websites, online video, blogs, and more. Analysts from the Public Good Projects triangulate this data along with other data from fact checking organizations and investigative sources to provide an accurate, but not exhaustive, list of currently circulating misinformation.Misinformation Alerts
Knowing what misinformation is being shared can help you generate effective messaging.
These insights are based on a combination of automated media monitoring and manual review by public health data analysts. Media data are publicly available data from many sources, such as social media, broadcast television, newspapers and magazines, news websites, online video, blogs, and more. Analysts from the Public Good Projects triangulate this data along with other data from fact checking organizations and investigative sources to provide an accurate, but not exhaustive, list of currently circulating misinformation.Alerts are categorized as high, medium, and low risk.
- High risk alerts: Narratives with widespread circulation across communities, high engagement, exponential velocity, and a high potential to impact health decisions. Are often more memorable than accurate information.
- Medium risk alerts: Narratives that are circulating in priority populations and pose some threat to health. Potential for further spread due to the tactics used or because of predicted velocity. Often highlights the questions and concerns of people.
- Low risk alerts: Narratives that are limited in reach, don’t impact your community, or lack the qualities necessary for future spread. May indicate information gaps, confusion, or concerns.
Several stories have been trending around adverse reactions to the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines. Last week a story about a nurse who fainted after receiving her Pfizer vaccine was trending, and in the last 24 hours the story has escalated to claim that she has now died from the vaccine (which is false). A story about a physician at Boston Medical Center who went into anaphylactic shock after receiving the Moderna vaccine also caused a spike in claims that vaccine ingredients are unsafe. The CDC asks individuals with a history of severe allergies to vaccines to consult their physician before receiving the vaccine.
Recommendation:
Direct Response Read More +
Directly address reported adverse reactions to prevent future misinformation. Use clear, consistent communication to make people more aware of what to expect, and focus on the fact that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks. Keep information sheets and website FAQs up to date, and make sure spokespeople are aware of recently reported adverse reactions and have a prepared response, in case they are asked. Sample Statement "Severe side effects for the COVID-19 vaccine are extremely rare. When minor side effects occur, they are a normal sign your body is building protection to the virus, and most go away within a few days. If you have questions about whether the vaccine is safe for you, you should talk to your physician." Fact Checking Source(s): thequint.com | factcheck.org | cdc.gov
A Facebook photo is being shared that shows a bloody and disheveled hospital room with a fake CNN screen reading, "Breaking News: Hospitals on lockdown as first COVID-19 vaccine patients start eating other patients." There is, of course, no evidence that possible adverse reactions from COVID-19 immunization include cannibalism. Multiple fact-checking sites have debunked this post.
Recommendation:
Ignore Read More +
Addressing this misinformation could distract from priority talking points about vaccine safety and distribution. Fact Checking Source(s): newsmobile.in
News and social media sites have shared a story about a nurse in Nashville who claims that her COVID-19 vaccine has caused Bell's palsy. Bell's palsy was also reported among a handful of vaccine trial participants, but not more than would be expected by chance, and at this time there is no definitive link between the vaccine and paralysis.
Recommendation: Direct Response Read More +
Directly address reported adverse reactions to prevent future misinformation. Use clear, consistent communication to make people more aware of what to expect, and focus on the fact that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks. Keep information sheets and website FAQs up to date, and make sure spokespeople are aware of recently reported adverse reactions and have a prepared response, in case they are asked.
Sample Statement
"There is no definitive link between the vaccine and paralysis. Severe side effects for the COVID-19 vaccine are extremely rare. If you have questions about whether the vaccine is safe for you, you should talk to your physician."
Fact Checking Source(s): fullfact.org
Several tweets from the UK are circulating, alleging that a new variation of the coronavirus was caused by Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine. There are two important things to know about this claim: first, the new variant emerged in September of this year and began circulating at low levels in the population recently. Second, Pfizer's vaccine uses mRNA technology and cannot give recipients an infection of the virus. Experts believe that the current COVID-19 vaccines will work against the variant.
Recommendation:
Ignore Read More +
Addressing this misinformation could distract from priority talking points regarding vaccine safety and distribution. Spokespeople should be aware of this misinformation and have a prepared response, if directly asked. Fact Checking Source(s): thequint.com
Claims are spreading on Facebook and Twitter that asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 is not real, based on a research paper published in Nature in November. The paper analyzed the spread of COVID-19 in Wuhan, finding low asymptomatic spread. However, researchers stated that strict measures public health measures were successful in reducing the virulence of COVID in Wuhan and that asymptomatic people in Wuhan may have low viral loads - therefore, the finding cannot be applied to countries with large, active outbreaks. Throughout the pandemic scientists have been working to understand the risk of transmission by asymptomatic carriers, and have continued to find that asymptomatic spreading contributes to the ongoing case numbers.
Recommendation:
Direct Response Read More +
Including explanations of asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 should be part of continued efforts to regularly inform the public on the evolving state of the pandemic and related public health guidance. Fact Checking Source(s): uchealth.org
A trending tweet questions whether flu cases are being misdiagnosed as COVID-19, with the tweet claiming it suspicious that flu cases have decreased so much in the current flu season compared to years past. Although the two illnesses have some similarities, swab tests to check for COVID-19 infection are highly specific and it unlikely that the flu would be misdiagnosed in a COVID-19 swab test. Experts also believe that flu cases are down this year because more people have gotten the flu shot and are wearing masks, two protective behaviors that reduce the spread of the flu.
Recommendation:
Ignore Read More +
Addressing this misinformation could distract from priority talking points regarding vaccine safety and distribution. Spokespeople should be aware of this misinformation and have a prepared response, if directly asked. Fact Checking Source(s): reuters.com
Similar to the previous week, posts across social media, news, and blogs are reporting that COVID-19 vaccines contain microchips that will be used to track those who receive the vaccine. This misinformation is a distortion of the fact that vaccine containers will contain barcodes in order to track their distribution.
Recommendation:
Passive Response Read More +
Directly addressing this misinformation in a public forum may make matters worse in that it could "add fuel to the fire" by increasing the number of people exposed to it, and unintentionally lend it credibility. However, updating FAQs on websites and info sheets that address misinformation is recommended. Additionally, spokespeople should be aware of this misinformation and have a prepared response, if directly asked. Fact Checking Source(s): thequint.com
Two people in the UK have had severe anaphylactic reactions to the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine. These people had a history of allergic reactions to vaccines. The CDC recently stated that people who have experienced severe reactions to prior vaccines can still get the Pfizer vaccine but should talk with their doctors beforehand, and be monitored for 30 mins after injection.
Recommendation:
Direct Response Read More +
Health communications experts are advising clear, consistent communication to the public regarding possible adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines. Directly addressing reported adverse reactions can prevent future misinformation, as the public will be aware of what to expect. Communications can focus on how the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks. Updating FAQs on websites and info sheets that address ongoing monitored and reported reactions is advised. Additionally, spokespeople should be aware of current reported adverse reactions and have a prepared response, if directly asked. Fact Checking Source(s): statnews.com
False claims are circulating on social media that the head of Pfizer's research department revealed their COVID-19 vaccine cause sterilization in females due to its inclusion of a protein called syncytin-1. The protein syncytin-1 is important in the creation of a woman's placenta. The actual Pfizer and BioNTech vaccine does not contain the protein, nor has the vaccine been associated with infertility. Claims around female sterilization from COVID-19 vaccines have persisted since vaccine trials first began.
Recommendation:
Passive Response Read More +
Directly addressing this misinformation in a public forum may make matters worse in that it could "add fuel to the fire" by increasing the number of people exposed to it, and unintentionally lend it credibility. However, updating FAQs on websites and info sheets that address misinformation is recommended. Additionally, spokespeople should be aware of this misinformation and have a prepared response, if directly asked. Fact Checking Source(s):politifact.com
Alerts are categorized as high, medium, and low risk.
- High risk alerts: Narratives with widespread circulation across communities, high engagement, exponential velocity, and a high potential to impact health decisions. Are often more memorable than accurate information.
- Medium risk alerts: Narratives that are circulating in priority populations and pose some threat to health. Potential for further spread due to the tactics used or because of predicted velocity. Often highlights the questions and concerns of people.
- Low risk alerts: Narratives that are limited in reach, don’t impact your community, or lack the qualities necessary for future spread. May indicate information gaps, confusion, or concerns.
Monthly Misinformation Report
Explore Public Good Project’s report highlighting high-level health trends. This report captures information from May 6th – July 7th, 2024.
2023 Trends in COVID-19
Vaccine Opposition
This new report details the trends in 2023 discussions about COVID-19 vaccines, identifying both persistent, recurring themes from previous years and new themes that emerged within the year. The goal is to equip public health professionals with information to help navigate future discussions around COVID-19 vaccines.
Categorizing Public Conversation
on Vaccine Opposition to Inform
Health Communications Strategies
This new report leverages PGP’s advanced media monitoring platforms and expertise in vaccine opposition to categorize narratives into patterns. These patterns can help health communicators plan messaging approaches and strategies to improve vaccine uptake.
Vaccine Misinformation Guide
Get practical tips for addressing misinformation in this new guide. Click image to download, or see highlights.