Misinformation Alerts
Knowing what misinformation is being shared can help you generate effective messaging.
These insights are based on a combination of automated media monitoring and manual review by public health data analysts. Media data are publicly available data from many sources, such as social media, broadcast television, newspapers and magazines, news websites, online video, blogs, and more. Analysts from the Public Good Projects triangulate this data along with other data from fact checking organizations and investigative sources to provide an accurate, but not exhaustive, list of currently circulating misinformation.
Misinformation Alerts
Knowing what misinformation is being shared can help you generate effective messaging.
These insights are based on a combination of automated media monitoring and manual review by public health data analysts. Media data are publicly available data from many sources, such as social media, broadcast television, newspapers and magazines, news websites, online video, blogs, and more. Analysts from the Public Good Projects triangulate this data along with other data from fact checking organizations and investigative sources to provide an accurate, but not exhaustive, list of currently circulating misinformation.
Alerts are categorized as high, medium, and low risk.
- High risk alerts: Narratives with widespread circulation across communities, high engagement, exponential velocity, and a high potential to impact health decisions. Are often more memorable than accurate information.
- Medium risk alerts: Narratives that are circulating in priority populations and pose some threat to health. Potential for further spread due to the tactics used or because of predicted velocity. Often highlights the questions and concerns of people.
- Low risk alerts: Narratives that are limited in reach, don’t impact your community, or lack the qualities necessary for future spread. May indicate information gaps, confusion, or concerns.
News is spreading that South Africa paused use of AstraZeneca-Oxford’s COVID-19 vaccine after a small-scale, unpublished study found it was less effective at preventing mild to moderate disease from the B1351 variant strain, dominant in South Africa. Misinformation is circulating that the vaccine is ineffective against all strains of the virus. Research studies are under way to confirm these preliminary findings, and to study the vaccine’s effectiveness in older adults, as some European countries the study’s earlier trials did not have sufficient data on this group. The World Health Organization has approved the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine for use in all adults, paving the way for its use in low- and middle-income countries.
Recommendation: 
A presentation containing an extensive collection of social media posts all claiming personal experiences with adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines is being shared no multiple social media sites. The presentation was made to appear as if the CDC endorsed it. Domestic and international posts were included. Tech companies have been removing the presentation, but it has been shared hundreds of thousands of times.
Recommendation: 
Anti-vaccine advocates, including senior leaders in the movement, are claiming that requiring a COVID-19 vaccine is a violation of the Nuremberg Code and health care providers who administer the vaccines are guilty of war crimes.
Recommendation:
A video claiming that COVID-19 vaccines are actually "gene therapy" is recirculating online. The video claims that 87,000 doctors and nurses have claimed the pandemic is overblown, that it is actually a typical flu, and that COVID-19 vaccines are unsafe. Medical credentials are highlighted to lend increased credibility to the widely debunked claims.
Recommendation:
A video from America’s Frontline Doctors, an organization reported by news organizations and fact checking groups as frequently sharing misinformation, was widely shared on social media. In the video, the group’s founder and CEO repeatedly refers to COVID-19 vaccines as “experimental,” and repeats debunked theories that the vaccines will cause infertility. The video encourages people to visit the group’s website to obtain a prescription for hydroxychloroquine through a telehealth visit with a pharmacy in Florida.
Recommendation:
To date, the CDC has not identified any cases in which a COVID-19 vaccine has caused a person's death. All reported adverse events following vaccination are being investigated. Despite this, some 180 deaths have been reported to the US-government endorsed and reviewed Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a passive surveillance system where any individual can self-report any health problem following immunization. VAERS does not require any proof to report an adverse event. Vaccine opponents have seized upon the reported 180 deaths to raise doubts about the safety protocols being used for mass COVID-19 immunization and to call for a halt to COVID-19 immunization. A longstanding criticism of VAERS by many of these same groups led them to recently create independent COVID-19 vaccine injury reporting systems, encouraging members of the public to report using these non-official systems rather than VAERS itself.
Recommendation:
Facebook, Twitter, and TikTok users are claiming that a recent sharp increase in COVID-19 deaths in Gibraltar is due to its recently begun mass COVID-19 immunization. Multiple fact-checking sites have reported that the increase was in fact part of a trend that had started before vaccination began.
Recommendation:
The 2020-2021 influenza season has shown lower-than-average reports of the flu, which most experts accredit to the public health measures in place to stop the spread of COVID-19. However, based on these low numbers, rumors are spreading that health officials have been falsely reporting influenza cases as COVID-19 cases, to make the pandemic appear more severe than it is.
Recommendation:
Vaccine opponents are using the reported death of a recently vaccinated 60-year old Orange County, California resident as further proof that COVID-19 vaccines are dangerous. This follows a similar pattern of associating COVID-19 vaccines with any reported death. Shortly prior to this story, vaccine opponents were attributing the death of a Placer County, California resident to his recent COVID-19 vaccination. To-date, the CDC has not identified any cases in which a COVID-19 vaccine has caused a person's death. All reported adverse events following vaccination are being investigated.
Recommendation:
Anti-vaccination advocates are making further efforts to link vaccines and injury by creating a new vaccine injury reporting system: vaxxtracker.com. Children’s Health Defense is also hosting a vaccine injury reporting system. Both sites are focused particularly on COVID-19 vaccines. These systems are not endorsed by public health authorities and have no relationship, legal or otherwise, with the US-government vaccine adverse event reporting system: the CDC and FDA-monitored Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). The creation of these new systems appears to be at least partly in response to anti-vaccination group’s distrust of public health and government authorities, and unhappiness with the administration of VAERS. Anonymity and confidentiality of submitted data into these new systems is a concern.
Recommendation:
Alerts are categorized as high, medium, and low risk.
- High risk alerts: Narratives with widespread circulation across communities, high engagement, exponential velocity, and a high potential to impact health decisions. Are often more memorable than accurate information.
- Medium risk alerts: Narratives that are circulating in priority populations and pose some threat to health. Potential for further spread due to the tactics used or because of predicted velocity. Often highlights the questions and concerns of people.
- Low risk alerts: Narratives that are limited in reach, don’t impact your community, or lack the qualities necessary for future spread. May indicate information gaps, confusion, or concerns.
Monthly Misinformation Report
Explore Public Good Project’s report highlighting high-level health trends. This report captures information from May 6th – July 7th, 2024.
2023 Trends in COVID-19
Vaccine Opposition
This new report details the trends in 2023 discussions about COVID-19 vaccines, identifying both persistent, recurring themes from previous years and new themes that emerged within the year. The goal is to equip public health professionals with information to help navigate future discussions around COVID-19 vaccines.
Categorizing Public Conversation
on Vaccine Opposition to Inform
Health Communications Strategies
This new report leverages PGP’s advanced media monitoring platforms and expertise in vaccine opposition to categorize narratives into patterns. These patterns can help health communicators plan messaging approaches and strategies to improve vaccine uptake.
Vaccine Misinformation Guide
Get practical tips for addressing misinformation in this new guide. Click image to download, or see highlights.
