Misinformation Alerts
Knowing what misinformation is being shared can help you generate effective messaging.
These insights are based on a combination of automated media monitoring and manual review by public health data analysts. Media data are publicly available data from many sources, such as social media, broadcast television, newspapers and magazines, news websites, online video, blogs, and more. Analysts from the Public Good Projects triangulate this data along with other data from fact checking organizations and investigative sources to provide an accurate, but not exhaustive, list of currently circulating misinformation.Misinformation Alerts
Knowing what misinformation is being shared can help you generate effective messaging.
These insights are based on a combination of automated media monitoring and manual review by public health data analysts. Media data are publicly available data from many sources, such as social media, broadcast television, newspapers and magazines, news websites, online video, blogs, and more. Analysts from the Public Good Projects triangulate this data along with other data from fact checking organizations and investigative sources to provide an accurate, but not exhaustive, list of currently circulating misinformation.Alerts are categorized as high, medium, and low risk.
- High risk alerts: Narratives with widespread circulation across communities, high engagement, exponential velocity, and a high potential to impact health decisions. Are often more memorable than accurate information.
- Medium risk alerts: Narratives that are circulating in priority populations and pose some threat to health. Potential for further spread due to the tactics used or because of predicted velocity. Often highlights the questions and concerns of people.
- Low risk alerts: Narratives that are limited in reach, don’t impact your community, or lack the qualities necessary for future spread. May indicate information gaps, confusion, or concerns.
The CDC investigated a potential link between the Pfizer bivalent COVID-19 booster and increased stroke risk in older adults. The investigation found no increased stroke risk. Several news headlines noted the potential link but not the result of the investigation. As a result, vaccine opponents are falsely claiming that the CDC found a link.
Recommendation:
High Risk Read More +
The widespread nature of the claim elevates its risk. The CDC investigated the early safety signal based on reports that 130 out of the 550,000 people ages 65 and older who had received the booster suffered strokes within three weeks. Emphasizing that a thorough investigation revealed that the reported cases did not represent an increase in stroke risk in older adults is recommended, as is explaining that the CDC concluded that strokes are unlikely to be linked to the booster. This conclusion is supported by the fact that no increase in stroke has been detected in U.S. or international vaccine safety monitoring systems, and large studies into the potential risk have not shown any association. Fact-Checking Source(s):
A widely circulated video features several false claims about COVID-19 vaccines, including that people who are fully vaccinated and boosted are more susceptible to COVID-19 than the unvaccinated. The video also falsely claims that COVID-19 vaccines are untested and are used to treat strep A bacteria infections, which cause strep throat and scarlet fever.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
The video has been widely circulated across multiple social media platforms, increasing its risk. Emphasizing that the claims in the video are based on misrepresentations of COVID-19 data is recommended. This data has consistently shown that vaccinated people are at a lower risk than unvaccinated people of severe illness, hospitalization, and death from COVID-19 and that boosters provide additional protection. Messaging may explain that COVID-19 vaccines were rigorously tested for safety and effectiveness. The vaccines are not and have never been used as a treatment for strep A infections. Fact Checking Source(s):
A widely shared social media thread and blog post claim that a member of Pfizer’s board of directors contacted the platform’s public policy manager to flag a post promoting natural immunity over vaccine immunity. The post in question claimed that immunity from COVID-19 infection was far superior to immunity from vaccination and that those who have had COVID-19 should be exempt from vaccination requirements. The post, which was not supported by scientific evidence, was flagged as misleading.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
The high-profile nature of the source elevates the risk of this misinformation. The viral thread insinuates that the board member pressured the social media platform to “suppress debate” about the vaccine in order to ensure the vaccine manufacturer’s profit. Emphasizing that the post was removed because it was in clear violation of the platform’s COVID-19 misleading information policy is recommended. Consider countering the misinformation by explaining that research available at the time, and confirmed by more recent studies, shows that vaccination provides better and more reliable protection than infection immunity against severe illness, hospitalization, and death. Fact Checking Source(s):
A social media account that has downplayed the seriousness of COVID-19—and was previously suspended for promoting misinformation—shared a text message purportedly from a former NFL player. The text states that the person believes the vaccine is responsible if they die or have a heart attack. A post sharing the image claims that we will see the impact of the vaccine in the next few years.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
Anti-vaccine advocates are using a young football player’s rare injury that is unrelated to vaccines as an opportunity to promote vaccine misinformation and dissuade people from getting COVID-19 vaccines. Emphasizing that there is no evidence that COVID-19 vaccines had anything to do with the player’s injury is recommended, as is explaining that injuries of this kind, while rare, were not unheard of in young athletes for many years before COVID-19 vaccines were developed. Around two-thirds of the world’s population has been safely vaccinated against COVID-19, including hundreds of millions of young adults. Fact Checking Source(s):
Articles and social media posts are claiming that hundreds of athletes have collapsed or died after receiving COVID-19 vaccines. The number varies from post to post, but a common claim seems to be that around 1,600 athletes have been impacted. The claim is based on an article that uses unverified “data” on athlete deaths and compares these unsourced numbers to a 2006 peer-reviewed study of sudden deaths in athletes under the age of 35.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
Consider countering misinformation by explaining that there is no evidence that a single death on the list is related to COVID-19 vaccines and that the “data” in the list is unreliable and unverified. The vaccination status of most of the people on the list is unknown. The list includes people who have known causes of death that are unrelated to vaccines, such as cancer, car accidents, suicide, and drug overdoses. Aside from the cases on the list being unverified and unrelated to the vaccine, the list also compares vastly different sets of data, since the original study was limited to athletes under the age of 35 who died of sudden cardiac arrest. By contrast, the list includes hundreds of people who didn’t die or even suffer serious injuries. Athletes who were well over the age of 35 are on the list, including some in their 60 and 70s who hadn’t participated in sports for decades. For example, the legendary Brazilian soccer player Pele, who died of colon cancer at age 82, is on the list. The article also fails to take into account when vaccines became available in the countries where the people on the list live. In several cases, people are included on the list who would not have been eligible to receive vaccines at the time of their injury or death. Emphasizing that there are mechanisms in place to monitor vaccine safety, that adverse events after vaccination are extremely rare, and that there is no evidence to support this misinformation is recommended. Fact Checking Source(s):
After a football player went into cardiac arrest during a Monday night football game, social media users and several newsletter writers spread false claims that the player’s cardiac arrest was due to COVID-19 vaccines. Others speculated without evidence that while the player’s injury could have had another cause, perhaps vaccination made it worse.
Recommendation:
High Risk Read More +
The athlete’s high profile and the heavy news coverage of his injury raise the risk of this misinformation. There is no evidence of any connection between the incident and the player’s vaccination—and many social media users also spoke out against those using the player’s health crisis to make anti-vaccine comments. People who spread anti-vaccine messaging frequently use the health issues faced by public figures to try to make claims about vaccination being dangerous. It is important to monitor any potential adverse effects of vaccines, and systems are in place to do so. But it’s up to medical professionals to determine if any adverse events have occurred, and there is no evidence connecting the athlete’s medical condition to vaccines. Exposing the disinformation strategies of vaccine opponents and emphasizing key messages is recommended: COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective. The risk of heart complications from COVID-19 infection is far higher than the small risk following vaccination. More Information: What happened to Damar Hamlin? What caused the cardiac arrest? Was Hamlin’s cardiac arrest caused by a COVID-19 vaccine? Do mRNA COVID-19 vaccines increase the risk of any heart-related problems? Do COVID-19 vaccines increase the likelihood of an athlete dying suddenly? Fact-Checking Source(s): Additional Articles:
After tackling an opposing player, Hamlin stood up and then collapsed. Medical professionals administered CPR on the field to revive his heartbeat, and he was then taken by ambulance to the University of Cincinnati Medical Center, where he continues to receive treatment.
Hamlin’s doctors have not yet determined the cause, but some medical professionals have said the incident was consistent with Commotio Cordis, a rare, serious medical condition that occurs when a person is hit in the chest and that impact triggers a dramatic change in the rhythm of their heart.
There is no evidence that Hamlin’s cardiac arrest was in any way related to a COVID vaccine. COVID-19 vaccine side effects have been intensively evaluated, and there is no evidence that cardiac arrest is associated with vaccine administration in the millions of people who have received it.
The mRNA COVID-19 vaccines developed by Pfizer and Moderna are among the most widely and safely administered and monitored vaccines in the history of vaccine use. They are associated with a very small risk of heart inflammation, called myocarditis. Myocarditis has many different causes and can lead to cardiac arrest in some instances. A study published in the American Heart Association journal Circulation found that the risk of developing myocarditis following a COVID-19 vaccine booster is low, and when it does occur, cases are typically mild. In fact, extensive research shows that the COVID-19 virus poses a higher risk for myocarditis than vaccines.
No. Despite false claims that COVID-19 vaccines have increased Sudden Athlete Death Syndrome (SADS), scientific reviews, medical experts, and sports cardiologists have found no association between sudden death in athletes and vaccines.
A website that publishes hoax news stories claimed that the government of Japan is investigating millions of deaths supposedly caused by COVID-19 vaccines. The post has been widely shared, including by several high-profile anti-vaccine figures.
Recommendation:
High Risk Read More +
The high engagement on the posts and the shares by high-profile figures increase the risk of this misinformation. Emphasizing that there is no evidence of any investigation into COVID-19 vaccines by the Japanese government is recommended, as is explaining that there isn’t any evidence of widespread deaths caused by the vaccines in Japan or any country. Billions of people have been vaccinated against COVID-19 worldwide, and the vaccines are safe. Fact-Checking Source(s):
A study of COVID-19 vaccine safety in older adults has been widely circulated and misrepresented by vaccine opponents. The study used FDA, Medicare, and Medicaid data for people ages 65 and up to flag early warning signals for increased risks of certain health conditions following COVID-19 vaccination. The study identified four signals that marginally increased following vaccination in this population. However, only one of the four conditions, pulmonary embolism, showed increased risk after accounting for the conditions’ baseline rates and additional factors that contribute to risks, such as age and nursing home residency. Multiple large English and Spanish accounts have falsely proclaimed that the study found that COVID-19 vaccines cause blood clots.
Recommendation:
High Risk Read More +
Emphasizing how the study is being misrepresented is recommended. The study found a modest increase in risk for pulmonary embolisms (blood clots in the lungs) in older adults following vaccination with the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. No other health conditions showed a significant increase in risk, and no risks increased following Moderna and Johnson & Johnson vaccination. The study did not find that the Pfizer vaccine caused the increased risk. Instead, it concluded that further study is needed to determine if there is a potential link between the vaccine and pulmonary embolism. Messaging may explain that many large studies have found no link between mRNA vaccines and blood clots and that over 95 percent of Americans over the age of 65 have safely received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose. Fact-Checking Source(s):
Several popular social media accounts are promoting the idea that mask mandates and other COVID-19 protections are responsible for the "tripledemic," the current wave of flu, COVID-19, and RSV infections that are overwhelming U.S. hospitals. One post claims that wearing masks weakened children’s immune systems by preventing exposure to germs, making them more susceptible to infections. This claim directly contradicts the anti-mask belief that masks are ineffective at preventing disease transmission. Another widely shared post says that COVID-19 restrictions have “dampened immune systems.”
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
Consider countering this misinformation by explaining that there is no scientific basis for the claim that masks or other COVID-19 protections weaken immune systems. Emphasizing that pediatricians agree that masks are perfectly safe for children over the age of 2 and research shows that masks reduce the spread of COVID-19 in schools is recommended. The “tripledemic” is the result of multiple highly transmissible COVID-19 subvariants, a particularly bad and early flu season, and increased indoor socialization without COVID-19 mitigations like mask mandates and social distancing. Masks were not the cause of the tripledemic, but they are an effective way to help protect against the respiratory diseases circulating this winter. Fact Checking Source(s):
Two prominent anti-vaccine figures had their social media accounts reinstated last week. The accounts were suspended earlier this year for repeated violations of the platform’s COVID-19 misinformation policy, which is no longer being enforced. Upon returning to the platform, both people immediately began promoting misinformation about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. Vaccine opponents and COVID-19 skeptics celebrated the return of the figures as a sign that public opinion is shifting in their favor.
Recommendation:
High Risk Read More +
The high profile of these sources of misinformation elevates their risk. Both of the figures have gained popularity and large platforms by using their scientific and medical training to lend credibility to the misinformation that they promote. Misinformation about COVID-19 will persist online, but steps may be taken to reduce the impact. Continuing to report misinformation on other platforms is recommended, as is exercising caution when consuming and sharing health information on Twitter. Following trusted accounts and double-checking that verified accounts are real and reputable sources of information are also recommended. Consider countering misinformation on the safety and efficacy of vaccines by emphasizing the amount of time and research that goes into the development process and that more than 70 percent of the world’s population has safely received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose. Fact-Checking Source(s):
Alerts are categorized as high, medium, and low risk.
- High risk alerts: Narratives with widespread circulation across communities, high engagement, exponential velocity, and a high potential to impact health decisions. Are often more memorable than accurate information.
- Medium risk alerts: Narratives that are circulating in priority populations and pose some threat to health. Potential for further spread due to the tactics used or because of predicted velocity. Often highlights the questions and concerns of people.
- Low risk alerts: Narratives that are limited in reach, don’t impact your community, or lack the qualities necessary for future spread. May indicate information gaps, confusion, or concerns.
Vaccine Misinformation Guide
Get practical tips for addressing misinformation in this new guide. Click image to download, or see highlights.