Misinformation Alerts
Knowing what misinformation is being shared can help you generate effective messaging.
These insights are based on a combination of automated media monitoring and manual review by public health data analysts. Media data are publicly available data from many sources, such as social media, broadcast television, newspapers and magazines, news websites, online video, blogs, and more. Analysts from the Public Good Projects triangulate this data along with other data from fact checking organizations and investigative sources to provide an accurate, but not exhaustive, list of currently circulating misinformation.Misinformation Alerts
Knowing what misinformation is being shared can help you generate effective messaging.
These insights are based on a combination of automated media monitoring and manual review by public health data analysts. Media data are publicly available data from many sources, such as social media, broadcast television, newspapers and magazines, news websites, online video, blogs, and more. Analysts from the Public Good Projects triangulate this data along with other data from fact checking organizations and investigative sources to provide an accurate, but not exhaustive, list of currently circulating misinformation.Alerts are categorized as high, medium, and low risk.
- High risk alerts: Narratives with widespread circulation across communities, high engagement, exponential velocity, and a high potential to impact health decisions. Are often more memorable than accurate information.
- Medium risk alerts: Narratives that are circulating in priority populations and pose some threat to health. Potential for further spread due to the tactics used or because of predicted velocity. Often highlights the questions and concerns of people.
- Low risk alerts: Narratives that are limited in reach, don’t impact your community, or lack the qualities necessary for future spread. May indicate information gaps, confusion, or concerns.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. recently released a video to “set the record straight” on his vaccine stance. The video focuses on side effects and alleged vaccine-related injuries and deaths, claiming that these issues are ignored. The anti-vaccine figure appeared at a political rally alongside former President Trump, who vowed to collaborate with Kennedy on a panel of “experts” to investigate chronic disease and childhood illnesses.
Recommendation:
High Risk Read More +
False claims about the alleged health risks of vaccines can increase vaccine hesitancy, especially when such claims come from a high-profile public figure. Emphasizing that decades of research have found no link between routine immunizations and any chronic illness or developmental disorders is recommended, as is highlighting how anti-vaccine advocates circulate this persistent myth to discourage vaccination. Messaging may explain that vaccines are an important part of pediatric care that protects children from deadly and debilitating diseases. Fact-Checking Source(s): National Academies, FactCheck.org
A well-known vaccine opponent is facing criticism from other anti-vaccine figures after he falsely claimed that ivermectin use is linked to infertility. Some accounts called the statement a “betrayal” and touted the anti-parasitic drug as a miracle drug that can fight cancer and COVID-19, while others claimed that attacks on ivermectin are part of a plot to promote mRNA vaccines and block it as a low-cost cancer treatment.
Recommendation:
Low Risk Read More +
Responding to false and misleading claims about fake COVID-19 cures may detract from priority talking points. Ensuring that information and educational resources address existing approved treatments for COVID-19 and debunk unapproved treatments and cures is recommended. Talking points may explain that studies have found no evidence that ivermectin is effective against COVID-19 or a “miracle” cancer cure. Fact-checking sources: JAMA, AP News
Several popular anti-vaccine accounts are using recent studies to falsely claim that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are more damaging to the heart than COVID-19 infection. Some posts link to an article falsely claiming that a new study found that COVID-19 vaccines are the sole cause of an increase in heart failure in children.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
Vaccine opponents use dubious “news” sites and questionable journals to advance anti-vaccine narratives. Debunking messaging may explain that the article misrepresented a recent study that has not yet been peer-reviewed. The study concluded that vaccination reduced COVID-19 hospitalization risk in adolescents and never mentioned heart failure or any heart conditions other than inflammation of the heart muscle (myocarditis) and of the tissue surrounding the heart (pericarditis). Talking points may emphasize that vaccination reduces the risk of heart failure after COVID-19 infection and that infection increases heart complication risk far more than vaccination in every age group. Fact Checking Source(s): Reuters, USA Today, CHOP
A website known for posting hoax stories published an article falsely claiming that Marin County, California, defied the CDC childhood immunization schedule in 2000 and now has a record decline in autism rates. The article cites a 2020 study that found autism rates plateaued or decreased in wealthy California counties, including Marin County. Social media accounts are sharing the article, claiming that the CDC is ignoring evidence that vaccines cause autism.
Recommendation:
Low Risk Read More +
The myth that vaccines cause autism is pervasive and growing in popularity. Debunking messaging may emphasize that the 2020 study never mentions vaccines or makes any reference to immunization as a cause of disparities in autism diagnoses. In fact, the researchers posit that wealthy white families are increasingly choosing private care for their children and opting out of state services, which were the source of the study’s autism diagnosis data. Messaging may also highlight that the narrative that Marin County is anti-vaccine is nearly a decade out of date, as its childhood immunization has steadily increased since 2015 and now sits at 95 percent. Moreover, in 2021 and 2022, the county made headlines for having some of the highest adult and child COVID-19 vaccination rates in the country, with over 90 percent of adults and 80 percent of children 5 to11 vaccinated. Talking points may continue to explain that decades of research show no association between autism and vaccines and that vaccinated and unvaccinated children have autism at similar rates. Fact-checking sources: New York Times, CHOP
Last week, WHO declared the mpox outbreak in Africa a public health emergency of international concern as several central and west African nations face rising cases of the disease. Sweden, Pakistan, and the Philippines have also reported mpox cases. The declarations set off a wave of conspiracy theories and debates, many linked to the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccines. Several popular posts falsely claim that mpox is a side effect of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, with some recycling the debunked myth that mpox is an autoimmune skin disease triggered by vaccination. Other posts doubt the existence of mpox and claim that it is part of a global conspiracy to force vaccines and control the population. Trending videos claim that a mpox “lockdown” is imminent.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
False and misleading claims about mpox’s origin, transmission, and severity may negatively impact efforts to contain global outbreaks, including vaccination campaigns. Debunking messaging may emphasize that there is no connection between mpox and COVID-19 vaccination, as evidenced by the fact that the disease was discovered decades before COVID-19 vaccines existed. Messaging may also explain that the countries most affected by mpox outbreaks have some of the lowest COVID-19 vaccination rates in the world. Talking points may emphasize that COVID-19 vaccines have been safely administered to more than 70 percent of the world’s population. Fact Checking Source(s): Full Fact, DW
Reports over the weekend prior to this week’s FDA approval of updated COVID-19 vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer sparked an online debate about the necessity and effectiveness of the vaccines. Several pro-vaccine social media users expressed frustration that the updated Novavax vaccine won’t be approved on the same timeline, with some posts accusing the FDA of “withholding” that vaccine. These posters insist that the non-mRNA vaccine is the safer, more effective option. Some posts rejected updated COVID-19 vaccines outright and doubted their safety and effectiveness, while others posts voiced distrust in the vaccine approval process.
Recommendation:
High Risk Read More +
Negative narratives about the safety and necessity of any COVID-19 vaccine may cause people to delay or refuse updated vaccines. Messaging may emphasize that all approved COVID-19 vaccines—mRNA-based and otherwise—are safe and effective. Explaining that delaying COVID-19 vaccination for a preferred vaccine is an unnecessary risk is recommended, as is highlighting that updated 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccines are designed to protect against currently circulating variants. Highlighting key talking points is recommended: The best vaccine is the one you get. Fact-Checking Source(s): CDC, Yale Medicine
A tragic August 9 plane crash in Cascavel, Brazil claimed the lives of all aboard, including several medical professionals traveling to an oncology conference as part of their continuing medical education. Vaccine opponents have seized on the tragedy to falsely claim that the deceased doctors had recently vowed to release evidence at the conference linking mRNA vaccines to so-called turbo cancer. Several viral posts speculate that the doctors were targeted because of their research in a plot to cover up alleged COVID-19 vaccine risks.
Recommendation:
Low Risk Read More +
This specific conspiracy theory is circulating mostly in anti-vaccine circles, but the “turbo cancer” myth is pervasive online, contributing to a larger false narrative that COVID-19 vaccines, specifically, and mRNA vaccines, generally, are toxic. Debunking messaging may emphasize that there is no evidence that any of the doctors researched or even made comments about COVID-19 vaccines and cancer. The only source for the claim is a conspiracy website that frequently posts hoax news stories. Messaging may also explain that turbo cancer is a myth made up by vaccine opponents that has no basis in medical science. Fact-checking sources: Lead Stories, Your Local Epidemiologists
The former CEO of YouTube died of lung cancer, setting off a wave of conspiracy theories claiming that the death was caused by so-called “turbo cancer.” According to the former executive’s family, she lived with non-small cell lung cancer for two years before her death.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
The false narrative that COVID-19 vaccines cause turbo cancers persists online. Debunking messaging may emphasize that turbo cancer is a fake phenomenon made up by vaccine opponents and not recognized by medical professionals. Explaining that anti-vaccine advocates have attempted to link various vaccines to cancer for decades with no evidence to support the claims is recommended. Talking points may highlight that analyses of real-world data find no increase in cancer risk following COVID-19 vaccination. Fact Checking Source(s): FactCheck.org, Your Local Epidemiologist
A post with over 8 million views and 100,000 engagements promotes a study that claims to have found that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines contain “unauthorized” nanoparticles that self-assemble into complex structures that cause blood clots, turbo cancer, and autoimmune disease. Several high-follower anti-vaccine accounts are circulating the study.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
The level of engagement on the source increases the claim’s risk. Messaging may highlight that the paper is published in a controversial journal founded by anti-vaccine figures with no expertise in vaccine science and that the journal’s editorial board has ties to a prominent anti-vaccine organization. Emphasizing that mRNA vaccines contain lipid (fat) nanoparticles that deliver mRNA to the cells is recommended, as is explaining that there is no evidence that these particles are harmful. Fact Checking Source(s): AP News, Public Good News
A new, non-peer reviewed report claims that COVID-19 vaccines are linked to higher excess mortality. Social media posts are sharing the report with the false claims that the vaccines have “no benefit” and that higher vaccination rates correspond to higher excess mortality.
Recommendation:
High Risk Read More +
The persistent and widespread circulation of the false claim increases its risk. Highlighting that the report is from an organization that previously published a discredited analysis that falsely claimed that COVID-19 vaccines have killed 17 million people is recommended, as is emphasizing that no credible, peer-reviewed study supports a link between COVID-19 vaccines and excess deaths. Messaging may explain that higher COVID-19 vaccination rates are associated with lower death rates worldwide. Fact-Checking Source(s): Public Good News, FactCheck.org
Alerts are categorized as high, medium, and low risk.
- High risk alerts: Narratives with widespread circulation across communities, high engagement, exponential velocity, and a high potential to impact health decisions. Are often more memorable than accurate information.
- Medium risk alerts: Narratives that are circulating in priority populations and pose some threat to health. Potential for further spread due to the tactics used or because of predicted velocity. Often highlights the questions and concerns of people.
- Low risk alerts: Narratives that are limited in reach, don’t impact your community, or lack the qualities necessary for future spread. May indicate information gaps, confusion, or concerns.
Monthly Misinformation Report
Explore Public Good Project’s report highlighting high-level health trends. This report captures information from May 6th – July 7th, 2024.
2023 Trends in COVID-19
Vaccine Opposition
This new report details the trends in 2023 discussions about COVID-19 vaccines, identifying both persistent, recurring themes from previous years and new themes that emerged within the year. The goal is to equip public health professionals with information to help navigate future discussions around COVID-19 vaccines.
Categorizing Public Conversation
on Vaccine Opposition to Inform
Health Communications Strategies
This new report leverages PGP’s advanced media monitoring platforms and expertise in vaccine opposition to categorize narratives into patterns. These patterns can help health communicators plan messaging approaches and strategies to improve vaccine uptake.
Vaccine Misinformation Guide
Get practical tips for addressing misinformation in this new guide. Click image to download, or see highlights.