Misinformation Alerts
Knowing what misinformation is being shared can help you generate effective messaging.
These insights are based on a combination of automated media monitoring and manual review by public health data analysts. Media data are publicly available data from many sources, such as social media, broadcast television, newspapers and magazines, news websites, online video, blogs, and more. Analysts from the Public Good Projects triangulate this data along with other data from fact checking organizations and investigative sources to provide an accurate, but not exhaustive, list of currently circulating misinformation.Misinformation Alerts
Knowing what misinformation is being shared can help you generate effective messaging.
These insights are based on a combination of automated media monitoring and manual review by public health data analysts. Media data are publicly available data from many sources, such as social media, broadcast television, newspapers and magazines, news websites, online video, blogs, and more. Analysts from the Public Good Projects triangulate this data along with other data from fact checking organizations and investigative sources to provide an accurate, but not exhaustive, list of currently circulating misinformation.Alerts are categorized as high, medium, and low risk.
- High risk alerts: Narratives with widespread circulation across communities, high engagement, exponential velocity, and a high potential to impact health decisions. Are often more memorable than accurate information.
- Medium risk alerts: Narratives that are circulating in priority populations and pose some threat to health. Potential for further spread due to the tactics used or because of predicted velocity. Often highlights the questions and concerns of people.
- Low risk alerts: Narratives that are limited in reach, don’t impact your community, or lack the qualities necessary for future spread. May indicate information gaps, confusion, or concerns.
Vaccine opponents are circulating a video of a woman describing her experiences with stroke and vision loss after getting infected with COVID-19 in 2020. The social media posts falsely claim that her health concerns are vaccine-related. The most popular post sharing the video was viewed over 3 million times. Vaccine opponents have accused the woman of lying about her condition to cover up a vaccine injury.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
Prebunking messaging may highlight the anti-vaccine tactic of baselessly blaming health concerns and deaths on vaccines, even after being proven wrong. Debunking messaging may note that in the first five seconds of the shared video, the woman explains that her health issues began after she got COVID-19 in 2020, before any vaccines were available. The woman has since responded directly to the viral post misrepresenting her story, reiterating when her symptoms began and that she suffered at least one stroke after she contracted COVID-19 and before she was vaccinated. Talking points may emphasize that COVID-19 infection increases the risk of serious cardiovascular events, including heart attack and stroke. Fact Checking Source(s): NYU, University of Utah
A U.S. congressperson who has previously promoted conspiracy theories and false claims about COVID-19 held a congressional hearing about alleged vaccine “injuries” on November 13. Several anti-vaccine physicians and an attorney who has led dozens of anti-mandate lawsuits were among those who testified. The hearing provided a platform for many false claims including that COVID-19 vaccines cause pregnancy complications, infertility, and heart attacks.
Recommendation:
High Risk Read More +
Although clips and quotes from the hearing have not circulated much outside anti-vaccine circles, vaccine opponents will likely use the hearing to advance their narratives for months to come. Debunking messaging may emphasize that the claims made in the hearing are largely based on misinterpretations of unverified safety data and low-quality studies. Two-thirds of the world’s population—over 5 billion people—received the primary COVID-19 vaccine series, with no evidence of widespread health issues. Over three years of research and rigorous safety monitoring worldwide have proven repeatedly that COVID-19 vaccines are safe for all eligible populations. Fact-Checking Source(s): ACOG, CIDRAP, Science Feedback
Talking Points Are COVID-19 vaccines safe? More than 150,000 people participated in U.S. vaccine clinical trials, and almost 700 million vaccine doses have been safely administered in the U.S., with rare instances of adverse reactions. To ensure the continued safety of COVID-19 vaccines, data from clinical trials will continue to be collected for two years after each vaccine is first administered to ensure that they are safe over the long term. As with all vaccines, there will be ongoing monitoring for adverse events among people who are vaccinated in the future. What is the risk of having a severe adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine? Severe adverse reactions after vaccination are extremely rare, but can cause long-term health issues. Rare adverse events – such as anaphylaxis and other allergic reactions, blood-clotting syndromes, heart inflammation, autoimmune diseases impacting the nervous system, and death – have been identified and investigated for legitimacy through the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). How were the COVID-19 vaccines developed so quickly? The process included the same rigorous safety reviews that are required for all new vaccines. Scientists were able to develop the vaccines quickly, safely, and effectively because the urgency of the pandemic created greater access to research funding, reduced bureaucratic obstacles, and encouraged unparalleled levels of government and industry cooperation. As new variants appear, vaccine researchers will continue to develop updated COVID-19 vaccines, also called “boosters,” to provide the highest level of protection against the virus. Does the COVID-19 vaccine increase risk of miscarriage? Studies show that miscarriages are a common outcome of a typical pregnancy, impacting 11% to 22% of all reported pregnancies. However, there is no evidence to show that pregnancy risks or complications, such as miscarriage, preterm delivery, stillbirth, or birth defects, are increased because of the COVID-19 vaccines. Data do show that experiencing a COVID-19 infection during pregnancy increases the risk of delivering a preterm or stillborn infant. For this reason, vaccination is critical to protect the pregnant person and the infant from negative health outcomes. COVID-19 vaccination provides antibodies to the pregnant person and the baby, protecting them both from the increased risk of serious illness. Why is it important to continue to collect data about COVID-19 cases? Are case counts accurate? COVID-19 case counts and deaths are key public health indicators, but experts agree that the number of COVID cases are likely undercounted and underreported. Case counts vary because of reporting barriers like the convenience of at-home rapid antigen testing and varied access to COVID-19 testing and diagnosis. COVID-19 death reporting is less burdened by the previous barriers but can be impacted by the timing lags in data entry across many systems of monitoring. The CDC COVID Data Tracker is a collaborative hub of COVID-19 monitoring information informed by state and county reports from hospitals, healthcare providers, and laboratories. The CDC makes this data publicly available and reports national COVID-19 data to the World Health Organization, as required under international health regulations. The current key indicators – COVID-19 test positivity, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths – help reveal COVID-19 trends across the nation. The National Center for Health Statistics also updates national statistics guidelines to ensure increased specificity and accuracy of COVID-19 death reporting. The cause-of-death determination guidelines distinguish COVID-19 and post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS) as either an immediate or underlying cause of death on death certificates and medical reports. These updates help to clarify if people are dying from COVID-19 illness as an immediate cause of death, or with a COVID-19-related illness or condition as an underlying cause of death. Talking Points and Answers to Tough Questions
Yes, COVID-19 vaccines are safe. The COVID-19 vaccines have been tested and monitored for safety more than any previous vaccine in U.S. history. All COVID-19 vaccines have been rigorously tested and reviewed for human safety through a three-phase clinical trial process.
The risk of having a serious adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine is very low—far lower than the risk of contracting COVID-19.
Common reactions to COVID-19 vaccination include mild side effects, such as limb soreness, fatigue, low-grade fever, headaches, and chills, which typically resolve within a few days.
It’s true that these specific vaccines were developed more quickly than previous vaccines, but their development built upon many decades of work on coronavirus vaccines and mRNA technology.
No, getting a COVID-19 vaccine does not increase the risk of miscarriage. To date, no monitoring system or studies have identified any association between miscarriage and COVID-19 vaccination.
Accurately tracking the spread of COVID-19 helps federal, state, and local decision-makers allocate critical emergency response funding and develop public health guidance.
An old clip is circulating of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. claiming that vaccine manufacturers intentionally produce harmful vaccines to profit from the treatment of vaccine injuries.
Recommendation:
Low Risk Read More +
Responding to each baseless claim may detract from priority talking points. If organizations wish to respond, messaging may emphasize that vaccines are held to the highest possible safety and quality standards and are closely monitored by researchers and health authorities worldwide. Fact-checking sources: CDC, College of Physicians of Philadelphia
False claims about childhood vaccine safety continue to circulate on social media. One trending post shares an anecdote about children suffering from dizziness after receiving three immunizations at a school vaccine clinic. The post questions why parents allow their children to receive multiple vaccines.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
Resistance to childhood vaccines is rising nationwide, with a growing number of parents opposing school vaccine requirements and seeking exemptions for their children. Emphasizing that all vaccines go through rigorous safety testing, including clinical trials, before they are approved for the public is recommended, as is continuing to emphasize that children are far more likely to be hurt by a vaccine-preventable disease than by a vaccine. Fact Checking Source(s): AAP, Boost Oregon
A physician who founded an anti-COVID-19 vaccine organization claims that children do not need COVID-19 vaccines, which she calls experimental. She also claims that doctors receive financial incentives to administer COVID-19 vaccines.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
False information about the safety and necessity of pediatric COVID-19 vaccines is widespread, resulting in hesitancy and low vaccine uptake. Debunking messaging may explain that the CDC and FDA recommend vaccination for children over 6 months because vaccines protect against severe illness and death from COVID-19. Messaging may also emphasize that health insurance incentive programs require doctors to meet performance goals related to patient care, including encouraging patients to stay up to date on recommended vaccinations. Vaccinations, including COVID-19 vaccines, are an important part of pediatric care. Fact Checking Source(s): AAP, Mayo Clinic
A trending video clip features a comedian repeating the debunked myth that Bill Gates admitted that vaccines are a part of his plan to depopulate the planet. The claim misrepresents Gates’s comments about the climate crisis, in which he stated that global access to “new vaccines, health care, and reproductive health services” would lead to slower population growth. This is supported by decades of research showing that birth rates decrease as living conditions improve.
Recommendation:
Low Risk Read More +
Variations of this myth have circulated among conspiracists for years, and responding to every false claim may detract from priority talking points. Continuing to emphasize the necessity of vaccines to protect against deadly and debilitating diseases is recommended. Fact-checking sources: Reuters, Poynter
A clip has resurfaced of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. claiming that COVID-19 vaccines cause heart attacks in vaccinated people at five times the rate of unvaccinated people. The clip originally circulated in January.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
The persistence of this false claim increases its risk. Debunking messaging may emphasize that COVID-19 vaccination is not associated with an increased heart attack risk—COVID-19 infection is. In fact, in people with previous COVID-19 infections, COVID-19 vaccination may decrease the risk of heart attack, stroke, and other cardiovascular issues. Severe adverse reactions following COVID-19 vaccines are extremely rare. Fact Checking Source(s): Science Feedback, AP
A far-right conspiracy article circulating on social media misleadingly claims that 1 in 3 COVID-19 vaccine recipients experience “neurological side effects.” Several popular anti-vaccine accounts shared the article.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
The potential for this misleading claim to cause vaccine hesitancy increases its risk. Debunking messaging may explain that the overwhelming majority of the “neurological side effects” reported in the study were mild headaches and drowsiness, and none were severe, lasting, or required hospitalization. Messaging may also note that the study compared side effects across different vaccine types, not between vaccine recipients and unvaccinated controls. Continuing to emphasize that over two-thirds of the world’s population has safely received COVID-19 vaccines with no evidence of widespread health issues is recommended. Fact Checking Source(s): Health Feedback
Several widely circulated posts claim that the spike protein mRNA in COVID-19 vaccines and the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) that transport the RNA to the cells are harmful. One post claims that the mRNA in the vaccine “hijacks” cells, causing them to produce “poison” spike protein indefinitely.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
The persistence of misleading and false claims about mRNA vaccine safety increases the risk. Emphasizing that ingredients in COVID-19 vaccines are nontoxic is recommended. COVID-19 vaccines use LNPs to deliver intact mRNA to the cells and then instruct the cells to produce a spike protein, which is not harmful to humans. Fact Checking Source(s): Reuters, Health Feedback
Trending social media posts are promoting misleading and inaccurate claims about flu vaccines. Well-known vaccine opponents claimed flu vaccines “do not work at all” and shared a video asserting the “flu shot is no longer really necessary.” Some posts claim vaccines contain toxic ingredients, while others promote supplements and vitamin regimens as flu vaccine alternatives.
Recommendation:
Medium Risk Read More +
Rhetoric that downplays the potential seriousness of the flu or the effectiveness of flu vaccines may negatively impact flu vaccine uptake, increasing its risk. Prebunking messaging may emphasize that the flu shot provides the best protection against the flu by reducing the risk of infection, severe illness, and complications. Messaging may also caution against supplements and other unproven methods to protect against the flu. Fact Checking Source(s): Mayo Clinic, Reuters, NIH
Alerts are categorized as high, medium, and low risk.
- High risk alerts: Narratives with widespread circulation across communities, high engagement, exponential velocity, and a high potential to impact health decisions. Are often more memorable than accurate information.
- Medium risk alerts: Narratives that are circulating in priority populations and pose some threat to health. Potential for further spread due to the tactics used or because of predicted velocity. Often highlights the questions and concerns of people.
- Low risk alerts: Narratives that are limited in reach, don’t impact your community, or lack the qualities necessary for future spread. May indicate information gaps, confusion, or concerns.
Monthly Misinformation Report
Explore Public Good Project’s report highlighting high-level health trends. This report captures information from May 6th – July 7th, 2024.
2023 Trends in COVID-19
Vaccine Opposition
This new report details the trends in 2023 discussions about COVID-19 vaccines, identifying both persistent, recurring themes from previous years and new themes that emerged within the year. The goal is to equip public health professionals with information to help navigate future discussions around COVID-19 vaccines.
Categorizing Public Conversation
on Vaccine Opposition to Inform
Health Communications Strategies
This new report leverages PGP’s advanced media monitoring platforms and expertise in vaccine opposition to categorize narratives into patterns. These patterns can help health communicators plan messaging approaches and strategies to improve vaccine uptake.
Vaccine Misinformation Guide
Get practical tips for addressing misinformation in this new guide. Click image to download, or see highlights.